Thursday, November 14, 2019

Why Do Wedding Hashtags Have Such Terrible Puns? - Core Post 5

Hashtags, for Losh, are about naming practices. Hashtags, like other digital objects we've discussed this semester, operate at multiple layers and scales: "hashtags. . .train the eye and set expectations about what to see," (56), they are naming practices, surfacing processes, and sources of noise. Tags are, like Chun's source code, a way of communicating with both machines and other users and, as Losh points out, can be applied to all sorts of ends. While not always explicit given the brevity of the book, Losh points repeatedly to the ways that power and its consequences flows through our tagging practices. I appreciated the conscious citational practice she is enacting as well as some of the historical references to modes of inscription and naming that predate the digital (I was struck by the short description of the water clock on pg. 100) and cross-cultural examples that take into account the global reach and instantiations of hashtags.

One hashtag phenomenon I find intriguing/annoying lately are wedding hashtags, where newlyweds coin a hashtag for guests to tag and organize their photos with. While I think this is a good way to create a crowdsourced wedding album, I often find that the tags feature a) truly awful puns and b) very heteronormative imagery: #GroomCaughtHisBride, #BrideFoundHerKeeper, #ShesAGroomsLastName, and more. Of course, I went to Etsy and, sure enough, you can have your hashtag printed in all sorts of media. I found several articles online that give couples  tips on constructing the best wedding hashtag (yes, you should bring back that cutesy pet name) or you can hire a professional to come up with a clever tag for you. Some even have hashtag generators (which the New York Times does not recommend, btw), one of which offered me gendered tag recommendations based on an intuition that the user of the site is a woman, who is assumed to be the one organizing wedding logistics, which now includes hashtags. The last name in the suggested tags is always pulled from the last name entered in the "fiance" box. This might be an example of the "domestication of the internet" Losh mentions (58), though in a different sense.





2 comments:

  1. I find it fascinating that you mention the ability to have your hashtag printed out in the physical space of the wedding (I have even seen wooden signs that contain hashtags). Outside of its ability to function within code, what resonance does the hashtag maintain? A great deal, it would appear. The offline hashtag still accomplishes its original signaling function, only it must be transmitted through the social milieu instead of an electronic one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A few years ago, the city of Montreal started an online campaign where they encourage tourists to find #mtlmoments photo frames all around the city (mostly near touristic spots) and to upload their photos and tag them #mtlmoments. It worked at first and the hashtag was filed city-sponsored images. However, people quickly started to flood the hashtag with less than courteous depictions of the city (dead rats on the streets, crazy road construction/detours, etc...). I found it fascinating how the city tried to recreate a certain version of itself around the specific logics of space that are inherent to hashtags. While this experience of rendering the "real space" of the city into a navigable online space failed (or did it?), it shows how prevalent the logics of hashtag is.

    ReplyDelete